Having that said, here are a few ways that I have found to solve such cases: With a next and previous edge. some database features that are only still available in DQL (Dgraph Query Language extending GraphQL). There are some challenges with working with the GraphQL standardized endpoint vs. Personally, I use Dgraph's Slash GraphQL service. There are a few ways that I have solved ordering which seems dependent upon the implementation of the graph dbms. This is a challenge I have faced multiple times here recently. I don't think other database types would be better than a graph database, but I'm open to using other databases (relational, NoSQL, etc). Add/delete a new sub-tree (Copy-paste a section of an outline.).Most inserts will probably be appending after the last child of an item. Add/delete a new item somewhere in the hierarchy.(If fully expanding an item would exceed n=100 items, stop expanding.) Breadth first, with depth first traversal of certain items: only get the top level items, fulling expanding a few selected items. Linear: get the first n=100 items when everything is "expanded.".Two common ways of querying this outline would be: The goal is to store and query a giant outline that can't fit in memory (just the necessary items are streamed to/from the user). New items may be inserted before existing items, so a simple increasing counter/timestamp won't work. The method should be efficient when items are added/removed. What is the best way to maintain the order of items when an outline is stored as a graph? However, there is one problem: the order of items is important in an outline, but a simple graph doesn't keep that information. I also really like the idea of modeling TaskPaper tags as nodes that any tagged items point to. Each item in the outline is a node of the graph that points to its parent and children. Well, at the end of the day TaskPaper is exactly that: an electronic sheet of paper to quickly jot things down, cross them out and move on.( TaskPaper) outlines have a natural hierarchy relationship, so a graph database seems like a great fit. I sometimes use a sheet of paper and a nice pen instead of this last file. The final file is called ‘Running tasks’ and it is usually for keeping the list of things which are ‘coming at me’ and need to be finished on the same day. Another one is called “Discussions” with the evolving list of items I want to discuss with colleagues (it is organized by the names of these colleagues). One is called “Key Projects” with a few rapidly moving projects (manuscripts are a good example). I usually keep three TaskPaper files open and ready for quick entry. TaskPaper is great not only for finalizing manuscripts and reports. It is to quickly throw things in and then check them off before any review is due. There is no need to keep TaskPaper as organized as OmniFocus. Completed tasks can be archived (moved to the end of the list) by pressing ⇧⌘D. Clicking on the dash in front of any task or typing at the end of it would mark this task as complete. Clicking on a project or a context would filter the tasks that belong to that project or context. Tasks are grouped under “projects” (any line that ends with a colon (“ :“) is a project) and can be assigned to “contexts” (the text starting with “ at the end of the line is a context). Within TaskPaper, any text line starting with a “ –” is a task. To capture tasks in TaskPaper, press ⇧⌘↩ (or another shortcut you define in Preferences), which brings up a little window where one or several lines can be added and quickly assigned to any of the open files and projects. It is great for managing items that need to be checked-off (often on the same day) but do not require thinking through, review and follow-up as in OmniFocus. TaskPaper is a text- and keyboard-based tool to quickly capture and organize tasks. Instead, of keeping such lists in OmniFocus I use a great app called TaskPaper, ideal for managing simple but rapidly changing to-do lists for which OmniFocus feels too complex and slowly moving. ‘ convert Figure 2 to black-and-white’ or ‘ cite a particular individual more extensively’). If you have ever worked on finalizing a paper you’re familiar with a long list of little (and not-so-little) things to do (e.g.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |